
Releasing Gitmo detainees has to be one of the most asinine, dangerous decisions President Obama has made, and he sure has made some doozies.
Read about one of the Gitmo monsters that our president has released into the hands of the Saudis, via Hot Air. The Saudis! Like they can be trusted to rehabilitate a jihadist.
Then, ask yourself whose side Obama is on in this war against terror. Oh, I forgot we must not mention that nasty “t” word. From now on it’s “an overseas contingency operation“. How ludicrous is that? You couldn’t make this stuff up; it’s so beyond the pale.

Diplomat’s murderer released from Gitmo
“Yesterday, the Obama administration announced that it had released Ahmed Zuhair from Guanatanamo Bay’s prison and transferred him to Saudi Arabia’s terrorist rehabilitation program. The Los Angeles Times informs its readers why exactly we held Zuhair at Gitmo for as long as we did. Zuhair was involved in the murder of an American working for the UN in Bosnia in 1995:
‘The detainees were sent back to Saudi Arabia, their home country, where officials will review their cases before sending them to a rehabilitation program. One of them was identified as Ahmed Zuhair, a relatively high profile detainee who, has been protesting his detention since 2005 through a hunger strike and has been force-fed liquid nutrients.
During a hearing in Guantanamo in October 2004, Zuhair was accused of involvement in the 1995 killing in Bosnia-Herzegovina of William Jefferson, a U.S. official with the United Nations. At the tribunal, U.S. officials said Jefferson’s watch was found on Zuhair.
Zuhair also was convicted in absentia by a Bosnian court in a 1997 car bombing in the town of Mostar. He also allegedly told another detainee he was involved in the bombing of the U.S. destroyer Cole in 2000, according to evidence presented at a Guantanamo proceeding.’
There was a time in American history where the murder of a US citizen, and especially a diplomat for the US or UN, would mean a relentless search and doom for the perpetrators. Apparently, those days have long since disappeared, perhaps about the time the US repeatedly offered its hospitality to Yasser Arafat, also implicated in the murder of an American diplomat in the 1970s. Now, even when we have one in custody, we release them. Great deterrent; I wonder how the diplomatic corps feels about this development.
Zuhair wasn’t just a random Afghani or Saudi picked up by accident. By his own admission, he participated in the bombing of the USS Cole, and the Bosnians want him for a terrorist attack there, apart from his involvement in the murder of William Jefferson. Why not give him to the Bosnians instead, even if we were inclined to release him at all?
The Obama administration has all but surrendered to al-Qaeda with these releases. If the murderer of an American UN worker and a participant in the USS Cole bombing can get set free, then who would Obama keep in custody? The administration is rapidly making membership in al-Qaeda and participation in terrorism against the US a no-risk proposition. (via Thomas Joscelyn, whose post should be read in full)
Update: More on Zuhair and his organization in Bosnia, the Saudi High Commission, here:
‘The SHC, while participating in some legitimate charitable functions, uses its cover to ship illicit goods, drugs, and weapons in and out of Bosnia. In May 1997, a French military report concludes: ”(T)he Saudi High Commission, under cover of humanitarian aid, is helping to foster the lasting Islamization of Bosnia by acting on the youth of the country. The successful conclusion of this plan would provide Islamic fundamentalism with a perfectly positioned platform in Europe and would provide cover for members of the bin Laden organization.” [Jacquard, 2002, pp. 69-71]
‘However, the US will take no action until shortly after 9/11, when it will lead a raid on the SHC’s Bosnia offices. Incriminating documents will be found, including information on how to counterfeit US State Department ID badges, and handwritten notes about meetings with bin Laden. Evidence of a planned attack using crop duster planes is found as well. [Schindler, 2007, pp. 129, 284] Yet even after all this, the Bosnian government will still refuse to shut down SHC’s offices and they apparently remain open (see January 25, 2002).’
Good luck on the rehab program with this hardened AQ operative. He’ll be back in Europe as soon as possible.”
8 comments:
"Obama Releases Murderer of U.S. Diplomat from Gitmo"
Disturbing headline you have there, Ms. Moore. SO I read the post. Oddly enough, this is the ONLY information in the entire post that ties Ahmed Zuhair to this murder:
"During a hearing in Guantanamo [sic] in October 2004, Zuhair was accused of involvement in the 1995 killing in Bosnia-Herzegovina of William Jefferson, a U.S. official with the United Nations. At the tribunal, U.S. officials said Jefferson’s watch was found on Zuhair."
Wow.
"Accused" of involvement. And the victim's watch was found on the accused.
Yeah, that's pretty much the makings of an open-and-shut murder conviction. SOmebody accuses you, and you have the dead guy's watch. Yep, clear cut, beyond a reasonable doubt!
This is EXACTLY why these guys deserve some sort of legal hearing. If the best you have on this guy is that he had the dead guy's watch, he deserves to walk. Correction: he DESERVED to walk a long time ago.
And they didn't exactly "release" Zuhair either, did they, Ms. Moore? No, you fudged the truth yet again (and notice how I'm struggling to come up with more and more sel-polite euphemisms for lying"?) in your headline. Zuhair was released from Gitmo, perhaps, but he was transferred into the custody of the Saudis.
So, in other words, Zuhair wasn't "released" and nothing shows him to be a "murderer"... but, other than those two minor discrepancies, your headline once again is fully accurate!
Oh, well, actually, not so. I'm sure President Barack Obama himself didn't personally fly down to Gitmo to do anything with this guy. And I'd be willing to bet Obama had little if any direct involvement with this particular case.
But other than all THAT, it was an accurate headline.
Diogenes, I noticed that you completely overlook his involvement in the USS Cole attack.
Also, if you trust the Saudis to bring justice to terrorists, then you are more gullible than I thought.
My comments were focussed upon the lie in your headling, Ms. Moore. "Murderer of U.S. Diplomat" has nothing to do with the U.S.S. Cole. So, put simply, you lied. Zuhair MAY have had something to do with the U.S.S. Cole, but I'm not even willing to concede that, at this point, because the only tie you offer to that crime is that it is ALLEGED that Zuhair told another Gitmo detainee that he had a hand in the Cole incident. You see, this is how the justice system works, Ms. Moore: ANYBODY can make any allegation they want, but PROVING it is a very different matter. Heck, you're living, walking, talking proof of that proposition, Ms. Moore: you ALLEGE al sorts of nonsense, but you rarely, if ever, prove anything.
And I don't necessarily have confidence in the Saudis bringing anybody to justice. (Although cutting off the hands of thieves seems to indicate that they're not totally lax in naw enforcement.) But it also seems pretty clear that WE cannot bring these guys to justice, either. If we could, why aren't we? If we're pretty sure that they did these murderous acts, why aren't we bringing them to justice?
There are really only two possible explanations:
1. We DON'T really know anything; we have our hunches, but no evidence.
2. We DO know, and we have evidence, but the government cannot use it because it's all been tainted by the interrogation techniques we used, years ago, on these guys to get the evidence. THAT is really the crying shame about the Big Dick's reign of terror: guilty guys get to walk, because the "good guys" did things that no American would ever want to see the light of day in a court of law.
I suggest a compromise here, Ms. Moore: if you admit you were in error in the way you composed your headline, we'll pretend like it was an honest mistake, and not an intentional lie. Deal?
KUDOS to the sanity of DIOGENES...Thank you for the reality based attempt at dialogue. The facts remain out there for anyone with an open mind and no agenda to see and judge for themselves. Unfortunately we have a few (about 20% in this country) that choose not to care about our nation of laws; not to care about what is morally correct; and not to care about the truth of Gitmo, the detainees and the other 100++ Black sites and hundreds of men and boys (as well as women and girls in Abu Ghraib) who have been tortured and abused for no reason other than a big pay off to anyone who could give a name including Al Qaeda and the Taliban. They don't care about the innocence of a man (or boy) who was tortured for YEARS to get him to give FALSE information.
Ranting against the evil detainees when only 5% were EVER "captured" by the military or through any intelligence gathering and the other 95% were turned in for thousands in bounty (giving a poor Afghani farmer $10,000 for a name is what is evil, not the poor schmuck who he turned in). Out of 855 only a hand full ever had anything of substance or credible weight against them, the rest were turned in and their accusers disappeared into the night.
Debra Moore is one more of that 1 in 5 who has her exceptionalist fantasy getting in the way of her intelligence.
As far as discussing the Saudis....Let her rant at the people she needs to rant at...The Bush Crime family...They are the buddies of the House of Saud who let the House of Saud be picked up in AF 1 to be whisked out of the country on 9/11 and 9/12 (the only plane allowed to fly for 5 days while we were in lock down; the only people allowed to travel for 5 days while we were in lock down) and it is THEIR boy, Bin Laden, who masterminded the entire attack and who is STILL out on the run, allowed to run free while Bush and Cheney refused to try to capture his butt and while he continues to use the House of Saud money to buy weapons (which I have no doubt have "Made in USA" stamped on the barrels) and who continues to be in communication with mom and the kids...
Let us not blame the millions of innocent people in that country either. It is that same nonsense that allows people to denigrate all Muslims and led to wholesale slaughter of tens of thousands of Iraqis for the oil they decided to live atop
Still awaiting your apology for the misleading headline, Ms. Moore.
How's that? I changed the title. But, the scenario remains the same. Obama is making America less safe.
Yeah, that addresses the issue, uh huh.
You now realize that having a guyu's watches doesn't make you a murderer. Now, he's only the "possible" murderer.
Thank goodness you're not a judge. And, hopefully, for the accused's sake, I hope you never serve on a jury, either. Your concept of the legal system is as skewed as your religious rantings.
"Obama making America less safe"? Umm, Zuhair was cleared for release by the _Bush_ administration. And it was because the evidence against him was garbage:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Zuhair#Admission_of_Insufficient_Evidence
Post a Comment